AI-Assisted Literature Reviews
Contents
5 papers covering hallucination rates across legal, medical and scientific contexts plus systematic-review screening. Most other Week 5 references are tool documentation rather than primary papers.
Each entry links to the canonical version of the paper: on arXiv, the journal, or the publisher. Where a paper is paywalled, the DOI is given for UCT-library access.
5.1 · The AI Literature Review Landscape
5.2 · Free Tools Deep Dive
Covers Semantic Scholar, ResearchRabbit, Connected Papers, NotebookLM, Google Scholar: tools, not papers.
5.3 · Paid Tools and When They Are Worth It
Covers Elicit, Consensus, Scite.ai, SciSpace, Litmaps Premium: tools, not papers.
5.4 · The Hallucinated Citation Crisis
5.5 · Building Your Research Workflow with Claude
Original workflow content.
5.6 · Hands-On Activities and Assessment
Assessment design.
Drafted with Claude (Anthropic) and reviewed by Jonathan Shock before publication. AI-generated errors are possible — if you spot one, please email jonathan.shock@uct.ac.za. Full detail: AI Content Disclaimer.
© 2026 Jonathan Shock · MAM5020F: Generative AI for Research · CC BY 4.0